The beat goes on (Bafta 2000 magazine)
Sundance Channel: What prompted CATHY COME HOME?

Ken Loach: CATHY COME HOME came about because I met a writer who was very concerned about the homeless and what was happening to homeless families. And in particular, what was happening was that they were getting split up. Husbands were forced to leave their wives because the homeless accommodation wouldn't allow them to stay together. And he [the writer] was very exercised about this and he wrote a story which described how a family was broken because they didn't have anywhere to live. And it's an extraordinary story. Very powerful story. You know, our society -- like your society -- claims to support the family but all the things that keep a family together the society chooses to ignore. We have great poverty in both our countries and that's very destructive of families. Yet the governments that claim to support families also allow the poverty to continue. So it's a film about that. It was a story of a family that's ... that broke up.

Sundance Channel: There was a lot of public debate following CATHY. What kind of impact did the film ultimately have?

Ken Loach: Shelter [a homeless advocacy organization] was being formed when we made CATHY COME HOME, and there was a general interest in homelessness, but I think the fact that the film was made helped Shelter get established. Shelter's a charity which is not only about giving money to homeless people but more importantly, it's about campaigning and getting involved in the political issues. And the reason why I would support it is because it is prepared to campaign politically. Because I think charity if you were just handing out money is by and large a very right-wing thing to do. And I wouldn't do it.

Sundance Channel: Are you at all concerned that, if someone sees a movie like CATHY COME HOME, because it's semi-fictional, they'll come out saying, "Oh, what a moving story." Instead of, "What can I do?"

Ken Loach: You try to construct the film so that the onus is left with the audience. Because knowledge is responsibility, isn't it? I mean if you know about a problem, a tragedy, or a political issue ... if you know, for example, that the U.S. sponsors terrorism -- there's a problem for you. That's a responsibility for you. And what are you going to do about it? So you try to construct the film so that the knowledge is left with the audience and it's not resolved and the audience then has responsibility. It doesn't necessarily work but that's what you're trying to.

© 1997 Sundance Channel L.L.C. Sundance Channel TM Sundance Television Limited.
Sundance Channel L.L.C. authorized user. All rights reserved.
This site was designed and produced by Viacom Interactive Services.

Download this article   



© World Productions 2000 / All rights reserved; Photographs © BBC, Channel 4 and World Productions. No material from these pages may be reproduced in any form without the permission of the copyright owners.